CWTS Leiden Ranking 2016 – Moving beyond just ranking

The CWTS Leiden Ranking 2016 offers key insights into the scientific performance over 800 major universities worldwide. A sophisticated set of bibliometric indicators provide statistics on the scientific impact of universities and on universities’ involvement in scientific collaboration.

CWTS Leiden Ranking 2016

List view

Order universities based on your preferred indicator.

Leiden Ranking 2016 - List
 cwts leiden ranking 2016

Chart view

Compare universities based on different indicators.

Leiden Ranking 2016 - Chart
 cwts leiden ranking 2016

Map view

Explore universities from a geographical perspective.

Leiden Ranking 2016 - Map

Moving beyond just ranking

In the 2016 edition of the CWTS Leiden Ranking, we aim to move beyond just ranking. The Leiden Ranking can now be explored from three different perspectives. In addition to the traditional list view, where universities are presented in a list ordered based on a selected indicator, the Leiden Ranking 2016 offers two new perspectives, the chart view and the map view. The chart view presents universities in a scatter plot, enabling two selected indicators to be compared. The map view presents universities in an interactive geographical map.

Multidimensional perspective

To emphasize the importance of taking a multidimensional perspective on the Leiden Ranking, in the 2016 edition universities are by default ordered based on the size of their publication output. To create a ranking based on an impact or collaboration indicator, you need to explicitly select the indicator based on which you want universities to be ranked. Also, in the 2016 edition of the Leiden Ranking, size-dependent and size-independent indicators (e.g., the number and the percentage of highly cited publications) are presented together, highlighting that both types of indicators need to be taken into account.

Differences with other university rankings

Compared with other university rankings, the CWTS Leiden Ranking offers more advanced indicators of scientific impact and collaboration and uses a more transparent methodology. The Leiden Ranking does not rely on highly subjective data obtained from reputational surveys or on data provided by universities themselves. Also, the Leiden Ranking refrains from aggregating different dimensions of university performance into a single overall indicator.

Leiden Manifesto
UMultiRank

Improvements in CWTS Leiden Ranking 2016

More information on the improvements made in the 2016 edition of the CWTS Leiden Ranking is available in this blog post.

CWTS Leiden Ranking 2016

More than 800 universities

The CWTS Leiden Ranking 2016 includes 842 universities from 53 different countries. The Leiden Ranking is based on Web of Science data. All universities worldwide with more than 1000 fractionally counted Web of Science indexed core publications in the period 2011–2014 are included in the ranking. For more information on the selection of the universities, please read this blog post.